Sunday, 30 May 2010

Google Me Better

A survey conducted in April 2010 by Capstrat and Public Policy Polling, found 22 % of respondents consider Google searches influential in seeking health information. How significant is this? Well, doctors were credited with 44% reported influence, and the search engine was cited more than twice as often as nurses, pharmacists, advocacy groups and friends or family members.

The survey also asked about the confidence the respondents felt in the information they harvested from different sources. Health advocacy groups emerged as a particularly trusted source of online health information: 71% judged Web content of such groups "somewhat reliable" or "extremely reliable". While more than half (59%) felt that way about organic Google searches.

Online communities continue to trail significantly. Only 12% of respondents used online forums in their last search for health information, and only 37% considered forums reliable.

The survey revealed significant differences in the way various segments of society use online communities. African Americans and Gen-Xers are significantly more likely to consider them reliable sources of information. Younger respondents were also much less likely to see pharmacists as reliable sources of information, perhaps reflecting the more impersonal relationship they have with chain pharmacists compared to their parents¹ long-standing reliance on the mom-and-pop operations that used to dominate the landscape.

"We found it interesting that popularity and trust don¹t always go hand-in-hand. People are quick to search the Web for health information, just as they use it for most other questions today. But when it comes time to make a decision, their trust resides where it always has ­ in people. This insight can be instructive to organizations working to combine health expertise with new strategies for communication." - Karen Albritton, Capstrat.

Data points:

  • 32% of African Americans cited Google as the most influence source for health decisions, compared to only 15% of Hispanics who found Google influential
  • 63% of women considered Google reliable on health, compared to 53% of men
  • 53% of respondents ages 30 to 45 found online forums to be reliable, compared to only 37 percent of respondents ages 46 to 65
  • 65% found a phone conversation with a nurse to be somewhat or extremely reliable.

Another example of the power of search in the healthcare arena, there are many more where these came from...

Sunday, 2 May 2010

The Times They Are A....

Every year the MIT Technology Review produces a list of the top 10 emerging technologies that will change things up for us in the coming months. This years list has just been released and includes two of particular interest (to me that is). The first is Real-Time Search and the impact that social networking will have on search. As web content changes (the proliferation of micro-posts), the trick will be to give the same credence and authority to those fleeting slices of different users current attentions (Twits etc.) that can be associated with the more permanent content and context that fuels the Google algorithm. Google and Microsoft are working hard on bringing this to life.

The second is Social TV. Which brings together the passive experience of watching TV with the active one of sharing comments, observations and ratings about shows, events and, yes, even commercials with the viewer's networks... For the TV companies, this is a way of fighting back against Hulu etc and developers and some cable companies are working on ways to enable a seamless connection between the TV and the social graph. An interesting extension from here will be personalised TV, as content that viewers may find interesting gets highlighted by their networks...

The full list of what's on the horizon is here.